Conventions

The characters which are part of the scripts that are in use all over the world are inventions of mankind. The differences between these scripts and their underlying structures make it plausible that the requirements are mostly culturally and historically based. One cannot apply the same (design) rules regarding harmony and rhythm for the Latin script to Hangul, for example, as the traditional music of Korea is not comparable to Western music and even seems to lack what we call harmony.

Part of a Korean newspaper combining roman type with Hangul

Therefore the rules for typography, derive from the scripts, i.e., the letterforms themselves. Rules like the ‘hierarchy of space’ (the relation between the space in the counters, the space between the letters, between the words, between the lines, and the size of the margins) cannot be universally, i.e., ‘cross-scripts’ applied, but only within the (elements of the) scripts themselves. These rules are anchored in what I would like to name grapheme systems (see Systems and Models).

The grapheme systems are the result of the sum of evolution, direct interference of scholars, and (the moments in time of) technical innovations. They are neither perfect nor sacred, but anchored in conventions. Conventions are blueprints for conditioning and conditioning on it’s turn preserves the conventions. That might be a scary thought for those who teach type design (at least it is for me!), but we simply have to acknowledge this fact and deal with it.

To understand the requirements, or to be able to deviate from these, one has to understand the structure of the underlying systems and models. The themes on which all current type designers make variations, find their origin in systems and models that were fixed in the fifteenth century by the invention of movable type. Type designers basically put a relatively thin (but often complex) layer of varnish by making variations on the more than five centuries old themes which have become the standard. The newly created typefaces are the result then of the designers’ insights, technical skills and, of course, the Zeitgeist.

Letterforms created for Latin but outside the conventions, such as Wim Crouwels New Alphabet, can only be judged as such by applying the rules resulting from the underlying structure, i.e., conventions defined by the different type design itself.

Frank E. Blokland

About Frank E. Blokland

Frank E. Blokland is a type designer (including typefaces, dtl Documenta and dtl Haarlemmer), Senior Lecturer of type design at the Royal Academy of Art (kabk) in The Hague since 1987, and Senior Lecturer / Research Fellow at the Plantin Institute of Typography, Antwerp, since 1995. Blokland founded the Dutch Type Library in 1990 and a few years later he started and supervised the development of dtl FontMaster, a set of professional font tools developed together with Dr. Jürgen Willrodt.
        On October 11, 2016 at 11:15 a.m. Blokland successfully defended his dissertation on the standardization and systemization in archetypal Renaissance font production.